Education Atlas

How Knowledge Is Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Learning Theory and Concepts

Procept

Constructivist and Situated Learning Theories

In mathematics education, a procept, a term coined by the researchers Eddie Gray and David Tall, is an amalgam of three components: a mathematical process, such as addition or a limit operation, the concept produced by carrying out that process, and a single symbol that can stand ambiguously for either the process or the resulting concept. The expression three plus four, for example, can be read as an instruction to carry out the process of adding three and four, or it can be read as simply naming the number seven, the object that process produces; the symbolism itself does not force a choice between the two readings, and Gray and Tall argued that this built-in ambiguity is a genuine cognitive strength of mathematical notation rather than a flaw, because it lets a learner move flexibly between doing a calculation and having a number or object to reason about further. Gray and Tall proposed that the ability to think proceptually, shifting fluidly between process and concept as a single compressed symbol, is a key marker separating more successful mathematics learners from those who remain tied to carrying out each procedure step by step, and the concept has since been used to analyze why some students struggle to move from arithmetic procedures to more abstract algebraic reasoning.

Facts
Core Claim
A procept is an amalgam of a mathematical process, the object produced by that process, and a single ambiguous symbol that can denote either the process or the object, unifying process and object views of mathematical notation. 1
Origin Year
1994 1
Sources
1. Procept (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Procept, lead paragraph
    a procept is an amalgam of three components: a "process" which produces a mathematical "object" and a "symbol" which is used to represent either process or object
  • Procept, second paragraph on first publication
    The notion was first published in a paper in the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education in 1994, and is part of the process-object literature.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.