Emile, or On Education is a 1762 treatise by the philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the nature of education and human development, which Rousseau himself considered the best and most important of his works. Rather than offering practical parenting advice, it uses the fictional pupil Emile and his tutor to explore how a person might keep their natural goodness while still living within society, opening with the claim that everything is good as it leaves the hands of its maker and degenerates in the hands of man. It argues for learning through sensory experience and direct contact with the world rather than through books alone, especially in early childhood, and it introduces more complex sentiment and social feeling only as the pupil matures into adolescence. The work had a lasting influence on educational philosophy, shaping the design of France's national education system during the Revolution and, through Noah Webster's adaptations, early American schoolbooks. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Core ClaimEverything is good as it leaves the hands of the Author of things, everything degenerates in the hands of man. 1 Connections
Includes
Source Emile, or On Education (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Emile, or On Education (Wikipedia)
Lead section
Due to a section of the book entitled "Profession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar", Emile was banned in Paris and Geneva and was publicly burned in 1762, the year of its first publication.
Politics and philosophy
Everything is good as it leaves the hands of the Author of things; everything degenerates in the hands of man.
View the SourceEmile, or On Education (Wikipedia)
Includes: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Lead section, first sentenceQuote, Includes: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Lead section, first sentence
is a treatise on the nature of education and on the nature of man written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.