The input hypothesis is a theory of second language acquisition developed by linguist Stephen Krashen from the late 1970s and set out most fully in his 1985 book The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, proposing that a language learner acquires a new language by being exposed to comprehensible input, language slightly beyond their current level of competence, often denoted i+1, rather than by direct grammar instruction or conscious practice of rules. Krashen argued that acquisition, the largely unconscious process by which a first language is naturally absorbed, is distinct from learning, the conscious study of grammatical rules, and that only comprehensible input drives genuine acquisition, with conscious learning serving mainly to help a speaker monitor and edit output. The hypothesis was highly influential in shaping communicative and comprehension-based approaches to language teaching from the 1980s onward, including approaches that prioritize extensive listening and reading over explicit grammar drills, though critics have long noted the hypothesis is difficult to test empirically because comprehensible input and the level i+1 are not independently measurable.
Facts
Core ClaimThe input hypothesis holds that a second-language learner acquires language chiefly by being exposed to comprehensible input slightly beyond their current level, one of five related hypotheses in Stephen Krashen's monitor model of second-language acquisition. 1 Connections
Policies Informed
Source Wikipedia: Natural approach
Sources
1. Input hypothesis (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph, Wikipedia Input hypothesis article, retrieved 2026-09-09Quote, Lead paragraph, Wikipedia Input hypothesis article, retrieved 2026-09-09
The input hypothesis was first published in 1977.
View the Source Wikipedia: Natural approach
Policies Informed: Natural Approach, Theory sectionQuote, Policies Informed: Natural Approach, Theory section
The input hypothesis. This states that language is acquired by exposure to comprehensible input at a level a little higher than that the learner can already understand.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.