Rote learning is a memorization technique built on repetition, in which recalling a piece of material becomes faster and more automatic the more times it is repeated, without requiring an understanding of its meaning. It is commonly used in schools to teach foundational material such as phonics, multiplication tables, the periodic table or anatomical terms, where fast, reliable recall matters more at first than deep comprehension. Because it does not build understanding on its own, it is often contrasted with approaches such as meaningful learning, spaced repetition and active learning, and organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics have argued that instruction should emphasize the mastery of concepts rather than memorization alone. Even so, many educators still regard some rote learning of basic facts as a necessary foundation before students can take on abstract reasoning and problem solving. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Core ClaimRote learning holds that repeating a piece of material makes recalling it faster and more automatic, independent of whether the learner understands its meaning. 1 Connections
Associated With
Source Curriculum Theory (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Rote Learning (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationLead section, first sentenceQuote, Lead section, first sentence
Rote learning is a memorization technique based on repetition.
View the Source Curriculum Theory (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationAssociated With: Curriculum Theory, History section (1828 Yale Report)Quote, Associated With: Curriculum Theory, History section (1828 Yale Report)
However, curriculum theory as a field of study is thought to have been initiated with the publication of The Yale Report on the Defense of the Classics in 1828, which promoted the study of a classical curriculum, including Latin and Greek, by rote memorization.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.