Structured academic controversy is a cooperative-learning strategy in which small teams of students study and discuss a controversial issue from multiple perspectives. It is a technique specifically designed to engage students with a controversy by having them examine opposing viewpoints, work toward consensus, and consider positions that differ from their own with respect for those who hold them. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Core ClaimStructured academic controversy is a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students. 1 Connections
In Approach
Source Structured academic controversy (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Structured academic controversy (Wikipedia)
Lead section, first sentence
Structured academic controversy is a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students.
Lead paragraph, education-level
Structured academic controversy is a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students.
In Approach: Cooperative Learning, Article text: in-approach
Structured academic controversy is a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students.
In Group: Cooperative, Peer and Small Group Methods, Lead
Structured academic controversy is a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.