The SAMR model is a framework for evaluating how classroom technology is used, developed by researcher Ruben Puentedura in the mid-2000s, describing four increasing levels of technology integration arranged as an acronym: substitution, where technology directly replaces an older tool with no functional change, such as typing an essay that could have been handwritten; augmentation, where technology replaces the older tool but adds a functional improvement, such as spell-check; modification, where technology allows a task to be significantly redesigned, such as students collaboratively editing a shared document in real time; and redefinition, where technology enables an entirely new kind of task previously inconceivable without it, such as publishing student work to a global online audience for feedback. Puentedura grouped substitution and augmentation as enhancement of existing practice and modification and redefinition as transformation of practice, presenting the model as a way for teachers to reflect on whether a given use of technology was merely replicating older, non-digital tasks or genuinely changing what students could do. The model has been widely adopted in teacher professional development on educational technology, though it has also drawn academic criticism for presenting the four levels as a strict hierarchy without strong evidence that higher levels reliably produce better learning outcomes.
Facts
Core ClaimThe SAMR model was designed to help educators identify different ways to integrate technology into teaching and learning practices, arranged as a continuum from substitution to redefinition. 1 FAQs
Why do many teachers still use technology only at the substitution and augmentation levels of SAMR?
Many teachers stay at substitution and augmentation because they are trying to fit technology to antiquated curriculum documents.
One commentary on the model, written by Mark Glynn of Dublin City University's Teaching Enhancement Unit, observes that many teachers are still using technology at the substitution and augmentation levels. His explanation is that they are trying to match technology to antiquated curriculum documents. In other words, the limit often sits in what the curriculum asks teachers to do, not only in their skill with the tools. The same commentary describes the model as a continuum from the novice level of substitution to an advanced, ideal level of technology integration at redefinition, meant to encourage teachers to seek better ways to include technology in learning experiences.
What does the SAMR model give teachers beyond a list of four levels?
It gives teachers a shared language for describing how and why they use technology.
It gives teachers a common language. According to a commentary on Puentedura's 2006 model, SAMR helps educators identify different ways in which they can integrate technology into teaching and learning practices, and it lets them describe the ways they do so. Using that shared vocabulary, teachers can identify the specifics of what they do and why they do it.
Connections
Associated With
Source Toward a Model of Learning Innovation Integration: TPACK-SAMR Based Analysis (Education and Information Technologies, 2021)
Sources
1. The SAMR Model, Allowing Teachers to Describe the Ways They Integrate Technology (Technology Enhanced Learning)
Technology Enhanced Learning (Mark Glynn, Dublin City University)Opening paragraph, developer attribution
Puentedura (2006) developed a Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition (SAMR) model.
Opening paragraph, model purpose
It was designed to help educators identify different ways in which they can integrate technology into teaching and learning practices.
View the Source Toward a Model of Learning Innovation Integration: TPACK-SAMR Based Analysis (Education and Information Technologies, 2021)
Education and Information Technologies (Springer), via PubMed CentralAssociated With: TPACK, Discussion sectionQuote, Associated With: TPACK, Discussion section
Combined, the TPACK model and the SAMR model reinforce each other to provide valuable insight into where challenges emerge and opportunities exist when choosing technologies for student learning.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.