Social learning theory holds that people acquire new behavior chiefly by observing a model, another person, and the consequences that model experiences, rather than only through direct reinforcement of their own actions. Albert Bandura demonstrated this in his Bobo doll experiments of the early 1960s, in which children who watched an adult act aggressively toward an inflatable doll went on to imitate that aggression themselves with no reward of their own involved. Bandura formalized the theory in 1977 and, in his 1986 book Social Foundations of Thought and Action, expanded it into social cognitive theory, adding self-efficacy, a person's belief in their own capability to carry out a course of action, as a factor governing whether a learned behavior is actually attempted and sustained. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Core ClaimPeople learn new behavior largely by observing models and the consequences those models experience rather than only through their own direct reinforcement, and a learner's self-efficacy, their belief in their own capability, shapes whether they attempt and persist at a behavior they have learned this way. 2 Classification
Education Level FAQs
Why did Albert Bandura rename social learning theory as social cognitive theory?
To stress how much cognition shapes the way behavior is encoded and performed; the 1986 book framed behavior as shaped by personal, behavioral and environmental influences together.
Bandura published the 1977 work on social learning theory, and in 1986 his book Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory introduced the triadic causation model and gave the new theory its name. He changed the name to emphasize the major role cognition plays in encoding and performing behaviors. In that book he argued that human behavior is caused by personal, behavioral and environmental influences, which act on one another in a reciprocal relationship. Personal factors include a person's beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy. Social cognitive theory was advanced by Bandura as an extension of his social learning theory.
Connections
Held Differently
Revises rather than rejects reinforcement-based accounts of learning by adding observation, modeling and self-efficacy as cognitive mediators.
Offers a different, cognitively mediated account of how behavior is acquired than strict operant conditioning, incorporating observation and self-efficacy alongside reinforcement.
Developed By
Source Wikipedia: Albert Bandura
In Approach
Includes
Long-Form Articles
Sources
1. Social cognitive theory (Wikipedia)
used in psychology, education, and communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing othersView the Source 2. Wikipedia: Social cognitive theory
Wikimedia FoundationCore Concept, Observational Learning
The theory states that when people observe a model performing a behavior and the consequences of that behavior, they remember the sequence of events and use this information to guide subsequent behaviors.
On Self-Efficacy's Role
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations.
Development and Key Figures
Bandura formalized the theory in his 1977 publication and substantially expanded it in his 1986 book Social Foundations of Thought and Action.
In Group: Observational and Social Cognitive Learning, Lead
Social cognitive theory (SCT), used in psychology, education, and communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influences.
View the Source Wikipedia: Albert Bandura
Wikimedia FoundationDeveloped By: Albert Bandura, Research sectionQuote, Developed By: Albert Bandura, Research section
Modeling as an important means for learning new behaviors and for achieving behavioral change in an institutional setting
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.