The critical period hypothesis holds that a person can achieve native-like fluency in a language only if they acquire it before a certain age, after which the brain's capacity for language learning declines. It was first proposed by the Montreal neurologist Wilder Penfield and his co-author Lamar Roberts in their 1959 book Speech and Brain Mechanisms, and was popularized in 1967 by Eric Lenneberg's Biological Foundations of Language. The hypothesis remains the subject of a long-running debate in linguistics and second language acquisition over how tightly the ability to learn language is tied to developmental stages of the brain, with direct bearing on when and how second-language instruction is best introduced.
Facts
Core ClaimA person can achieve native-like fluency in a language only if it is acquired before a certain critical age, after which the capacity for language learning declines. 1 Sources
1. Wikipedia: Critical Period Hypothesis
Wikimedia FoundationWikipedia Critical period hypothesis, lead paragraph, sentence 1
The critical period hypothesis is a hypothesis within the field of linguistics and second language acquisition that claims a person can achieve native-like fluency in a language only before a certain age.
Wikipedia Critical period hypothesis, lead section, origin-attribution sentence
The critical period hypothesis was first proposed by Montreal neurologist Wilder Penfield and co-author Lamar Roberts in their 1959 book Speech and Brain Mechanisms.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.