Connected learning is a model of learning developed by the Connected Learning Research Network, a group of scholars led by the digital-media researcher Mimi Ito, and set out most fully in the 2013 report Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. The model holds that learning is most effective, durable and meaningful when it is socially embedded, interest-driven and oriented toward a real educational, economic, political or civic opportunity, rather than confined to a single classroom or a single interest treated in isolation. It describes three core properties that connected learning environments should provide: production-centered learning, in which learners make and share things rather than only consume content; a shared purpose, in which learners work alongside peers and mentors around a common interest across differences of age, class or background; and openly networked structure, in which learning resources are accessible across the various settings of a young person's life, including school, home, and out-of-school programs. The theory emerged from research into how young people learn through participation in online affinity communities and interest-driven networks such as fan communities, gaming groups and maker communities, and it argues that connecting a learner's personal interests and peer relationships to academic content and future opportunity, through the support of caring adults, produces stronger and more lasting engagement than interest and academic learning kept separate.
Facts
Core ClaimConnected learning holds that young people learn best when they pursue a personal interest together with peers and mentors who share it, and when that learning is directed toward opportunity and recognition, using new media to broaden access to it. 1 FAQs
What objections have been raised against connected learning?
Critics call it a buzzword for corporatization, short on critical thinking, blind to earlier K-12 work and a burden on supporters; Mimi Ito replied that its principles came from a broad range of practitioners.
Educators and policymakers have raised several concerns about the model. Some say connected learning is another buzzword for the corporatization of education. Others say it is devoid of critical thinking, because it relies on a formula in which students get what they already want to find rather than broadening their horizons to discover what is not already known. A third objection is that the model makes no mention of the K-12 educators who had been pushing for similar networked learning for the previous decade, and a fourth is that it increases the workload of those who support learners. Mimi Ito, chair of the Connected Learning Research Network, replied that the principles were developed with a diverse range of practitioners in schools, museums, libraries, media, technology and universities, and that the research network is by no means the driving force behind the wider connected learning effort.
Sources
1. Connected Learning (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationLead paragraph
The connected learning model suggests that youth learn best when they are interested in what they are learning, have peers and mentors who share these interests, and their learnings are directed toward opportunity and recognition.
References list, Ito et al. citation
Ito, M.; Guti\u00e9rrez, K.; Livingstone, S.; Penuel, B.; Rhodes, J.; Salen, K.; Sefton-Green, J.; Watkins, S.G. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design
In Group: Learning Communities and Networks, Lead
Connected learning is a type of learning in which a young person pursues a personal interest with friends and adults.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.