Education Atlas

How Knowledge Is Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Learning Theory and Concepts

Component Display Theory

Instructional Design and Curriculum Frameworks

Component display theory is an instructional design theory developed by the American educational psychologist M. David Merrill, published in 1983 as a chapter in Charles Reigeluth's edited volume Instructional-Design Theories and Models. The theory classifies instructional content along two independent dimensions: a content dimension distinguishing facts, concepts, procedures and principles, and a performance dimension distinguishing whether a learner is expected to remember, use or find that content. Crossing these two dimensions produces a matrix of content-by-performance combinations, and Merrill prescribed, for each cell of that matrix, an appropriate set of primary presentation forms, such as a rule, an example or a practice item, along with secondary presentation forms, such as a prerequisite, a mnemonic or feedback, intended to help a learner reach the matching objective. The theory was among the first instructional design frameworks to argue that different combinations of content type and desired performance call for genuinely different instructional treatments rather than a single generic teaching method, and it directly shaped Merrill's later, more broadly framed First Principles of Instruction.

Facts
Core Claim
The Component Display Theory (CDT) classifies learning into two dimensions: content and performance. 1
Origin Year
1983 1
Sources
1. M. David Merrill (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Research, Component Display Theory subsection, first sentence
    The Component Display Theory (CDT) classifies learning into two dimensions: content and performance.
  • Research, Component Display Theory subsection, Merrill 1983 reference
    Merrill, M.D. (1983). "Component Display Theory". In Reigeluth, C. (ed.). Instructional Design Theories in Action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associations.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.