Education Atlas

How Knowledge Is Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Learning Theory and Concepts

Cognitive Rigor

Instructional Design and Curriculum Frameworks

Cognitive rigor is a model, developed in 2005 by Karin Hess of the National Center for Assessment, that superimposes two widely used American education frameworks, Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge, into a single four-by-six matrix known as the Cognitive Rigor Matrix or Hess Matrix. Bloom's Taxonomy categorizes the type of cognitive process a task demands while Webb's Depth of Knowledge measures the depth and scope of understanding a task requires, and the combined matrix is meant to check that curriculum materials, lesson plans and assessment items are challenging students to the level of thinking intended rather than only the level either framework would show alone. The model has since been adopted by the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium to measure test-item rigor and is used in professional development materials by school systems including the Arizona Department of Education, the New York City Department of Education and Chicago Public Schools.

Facts
Core Claim
Cognitive rigor is a combined model developed by superimposing two existing models for describing rigor that are widely accepted in the education system in the United States. 1
Origin Year
2005 1
Connections

Informed By

Cognitive Rigor's own entity-description states it superimposes Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge into a single matrix.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Cognitive rigor
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section, first sentence
    Cognitive rigor is a combined model developed by superimposing two existing models for describing rigor that are widely accepted in the education system in the United States.
  • Lead section, third paragraph, sentence beginning "The idea of interlacing"
    was completed in 2005 by Karin Hess of the National Center for Assessment, producing a 4 X 6 matrix (the Cognitive Rigor Matrix or Hess Matrix)
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.