The 4C/ID model, short for the four-component instructional design model, is an instructional design framework developed by the Dutch educational psychologist Jeroen van Merrienboer and presented in his 1997 book Training Complex Cognitive Skills, created specifically to design instruction for complex learning that integrates knowledge, skills and attitudes into coordinated real-world performance. The model organizes instruction around four interconnected components: learning tasks, whole, authentic, meaningful tasks based on real-life problems that give learners practice in the complete performance; supportive information, explanatory material that helps learners with the non-routine, problem-solving aspects of a task; procedural information, precise, just-in-time instructions provided while learners work on the routine aspects of a task; and part-task practice, additional repeated practice on a specific routine sub-skill needed until it becomes fast and automatic. The model was developed partly as a reaction against instructional approaches that taught component skills separately and hoped learners would later combine them on their own, arguing instead that complex, real-world tasks should stay whole and authentic throughout training while targeted support and practice are layered around them.
Facts
Core ClaimThe 4C/ID model designs instruction for complex skills around four components, learning tasks, supportive information, procedural information, and part-task practice, integrated around authentic whole tasks rather than isolated subskills. 1 Sources
1. EduTechWiki: 4C-ID
EduTechWikiReferences section, van Merriënboer 1997 entry
van Merriënboer, J.J.G (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
main description
The 4C/ID instructional model is characterized by four components: (1) Learning Tasks, (2) Supportive Information, (3) Procedural Information and (4) Part-Task Practice.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.